Overcoming the quarrels caused by the deprivations of imprisonment through self-sacrifice

Because of the hunger, there were often unpleasant arguments in the cell over the choice of cake. Valeriu, knowing this—and being humble and modest—always sat last, meaning he received the smallest piece.

In his heart, he rejoiced at this small gesture of love and devotion. Yet, while some admired his humility, others thought it would be fair for him to choose the largest piece when his turn came. Obeying the established order, when he happened to be called before the others, he would take whichever piece lay directly in front of him, at random—so as to avoid the temptation of greed and not to trouble his brothers with inner suffering. This small act was later remembered as an example for all.

In daily life, other minor disagreements often arose in the cell: how, when, and for how long to air the room; how to share the use of bedding; or who had the right to walk along the two metres of space left uncovered by the bunks. Conflicting interests and opinions frequently led to tension. Valeriu remained silent whenever such discussions began.

Someone would ask him:

— But what about you?

And he would reply gently:

— I think it’s fine however you decide. If we cannot live fraternally amid this great suffering, how can we expect people to share the riches of the whole world with justice and love? If we cannot be good here, how will we be good when we are strong and free? With a little love, we will feel the joy of doing God’s will and sharing in our brother’s joy. We need a broad and deep understanding of man if we are to live in peace and goodwill.

(John Ianolide – Return to Christ. Document for a New World)